UP CLOSE AND PERSONAL
PHILLIP DAY on CTE, the European Union
and the dastardly Food Supplements Directive (FSD)

Phillip Day is Chief Executive and founder of the Campaign for Truth in Medicine (CTM) and is an author, researcher, educator and world-class speaker of many years' standing. In a series of interviews EClub shall be publishing, entitled 'Up Close and Personal', our doughty editorial team decided to put their own CEO under the grill to find out where he is coming from on a number of thorny issues affecting the public today. Here, in the first of these interviews, Phillip Day explains his motivations behind the founding of the Campaign for Truth in Europe (CTE).

ECLUB: Phillip, thanks for taking time out to do this interview.

PHILLIP DAY: It's my pleasure.

ECLUB: Your new venture is the Campaign for Truth in Europe, which is designed to educate the public on the various dangers, as you put it, of Britain remaining inside the European Union. This might be construed by many as an unwelcome foray into the political arena when people know you chiefly for your work in health. Can you tell us what prompted this new project?

PHILLIP DAY: I'd be delighted to. From its inception, Credence's job as a research unit has been to uncover covert agendas that are harmful to the public and educate the public about them. Originally we began, not in health, but in the exposing of fraud in banking and finance in America - a job guaranteed for life. A number of years ago, my organisation began receiving briefs on the ulterior political intentions of the European federalist movement to bring Britain into the new federal superstate that was being planned for Europe, yet we saw there were no plans directly to consult the British people about it. So, in a sense, the new project with the Campaign for Truth in Europe is merely a continuation of the work we used to do in the political/economic realms before we commenced the health project.

ECLUB: What, in your opinion, do most British people think the EU stands for?

PHILLIP DAY: We've done a number of interviews and not one member of the public we spoke to actually realised the EU ultimately means a loss of British government control and citizen sovereignty over our nation's affairs and a handing over of our country to a cabal of European powers dominated by France and Germany. Those we spoke to, who bothered to comment about the EU at all - and the apathy issue I'll address in a moment - just see the EU as simply convenient for travel (not having to change pounds into pesetas, etc.), and a hazy conviction that if all the politicians are recommending full membership, then it must be a good thing for the country.

ECLUB: Are you saying that Britain made a bad mistake joining the EEC and EU?

PHILLIP DAY: Without any hesitation in my mind at all - and on all levels. In 1973, Prime Minister Edward Heath grossly misled the UK general public, stating that EEC membership would not threaten UK freedoms and sovereignty. With those deceitful words, Heath took Britain into the EEC. Ever since that time, Britain has suffered wave after wave of legislation that has bound her free-market tendencies, destroyed her farming and fishing industries, and created havoc with other areas of her commerce. How many British people know that the hated British sales tax, VAT (value-added tax), was introduced as an EEC tax, as a direct result of our impending membership to the Common Market, although most still believe it is a British levy. VAT, by the way, is projected to rise to 25% once we are fully in the euro. This, along with a devastating increase in income tax, will be required to continue funding the wasteful Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), which mostly benefits the French farming community at the expense of our own. Also, there are all those poor ex-Soviet satellites like Poland, Hungary, Lithuania and Latvia, to pay for when they come on board after 1st May 2004.

ECLUB: Why is the EU such a bad idea, given the problem Europe has traditionally had with war?

PHILLIP DAY: In a perfect world, there's nothing wrong with the idea of a united Europe at all, and actually I am not against the principle of it, so long as there are checks and balances. Churchill certainly believed that some sort of European union could be the answer to a rapid post-war recovery. But here is the point most often forgotten - Churchill never saw Britain ever being part of any European union. He saw us as sympathetic and friendly to a united Europe, but never a part of it. There's no question in my mind that Churchill would be horrified to see what is happening to Britain today.

ECLUB: But hasn't this United Europe movement kept peace on the Continent for the past 50 years?

PHILLIP DAY: The tendency of our socialist left to re-write history would have it that the EU, the EEC and their forerunners have been the ones to keep the peace in Europe these last 50 years, so you'd be forgiven for believing that was the case. It is politically uncomfortable for these unfortunates to admit that it has in fact been the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), and in particular, the Americans, who have been the principal investors in European peace. Today, America actually spends more on the defence of Europe than all the European nations COMBINED. France, now safe and free to indulge in her traditional anti-Americanism, tends to forget this, and has spurned NATO even though the founding NATO allies liberated her from the Germans - twice.

ECLUB: So why wouldn't the EU work well for Europe rather than Britain?

PHILLIP DAY: It would be the ideal way to govern Europe, if it were set up as a parliamentary democracy with the appropriate checks and balances. But that is NOT what the European Union is. In fact, the EU is the complete antithesis of a democracy, even though it has been carefully constructed to look like one.

ECLUB: Is it because the European Union is federal?

PHILLIP DAY: Not at all. Federalisation itself is not evil or wicked. The idea of having a smallish federal government adjudicating the overall affairs of its separate states, with sufficient power devolved to the state governments to run their own affairs, is actually quite an efficient way of administrating a large land mass, and was the brainchild of the founding fathers of America after they gained independence from the British. Despite the traditional reservations, federalisation seems to have worked well for the USA; and Canada and Australia copied the model for their own governments. Whatever you say, the visible result has been peace within these regions. You don't often hear of California declaring war on Nevada. Or Manitoba on Ontario.

And then we must remember that Britain herself is a federation of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, brought about through England's necessity to secure its vulnerable northern border. And even though the governance of the United Kingdom, as it came to be known, was based in London, the idea for the UK was actually the brainchild of the Scottish, who have been tremendously important to the success of Britain since the Act of Union in 1707, as have the Welsh. Britain has seen its finest days under this system of federal union encompassed in the words 'Great Britain'. To illustrate this, the last clash of steel in England was heard in 1685 at Sedgemoor. Not a bad track record of peace for my own country. Of course, we have had some notably shameful episodes of power abuse, for instance, against the Irish and in a certain number of inhumane and totally unacceptable 'land-and-people-grabs' as The British Empire sought to expand and exert its authority. On the whole however, Britain has a history of achievement of which its citizens can be justifiably proud.

Now, when we examine the kind of federation the EU has set up for Europe, what we see taking shape is something altogether different… and incredibly dangerous.

ECLUB: In what way?

PHILLIP DAY: Firstly, to federate a group of areas into one overall zone, there are certain requirements within the states to be governed that are conspicuously and ominously missing in the European project. For instance, a similar language, a common currency, a symbiotic concordance of economic cycles, a free and easy movement of labour, and, perhaps most importantly, the desire of the people themselves to be so governed. In the USA, if you live in the state of Mississippi and work is scarce, it's not a huge bother to move to Illinois and try your luck up there. The language is the same, the money is still dollars, and you are still proud to be an American, and so on. In Europe, you are dealing with a huge disparity of language, culture, money, economic cycles, a stiff movement of labour, and a hostility of many towards this form of homogenisation. Think about it. Would anyone struggling for work in Putney, London seriously consider moving to Finland to better their prospects? It's not likely, is it?

ECLUB: So you're saying that the EU has bitten off more than it can chew?

PHILLIP DAY: I'm saying that most of the people who designed the EU were themselves not bad people. A few were communists and ex-Nazis however with their own agendas. Many today still remember the horrors of the last war, and the push towards a European union of some sort following 1945, which Churchill witnessed, was a natural response to preventing anything like this ever happening again. But there are problems - and serious ones - emerging now the whole EU operation has been up and running for a while.

ECLUB: Give us some examples.

PHILLIP DAY: Firstly, the idea that you can even dream of lashing a dozen and a half very different economies to one currency and one set of interest rates is hugely disconcerting. That's like trying to use one drug to cure all diseases. It's known in Europe as 'One Size Fits All', which is all well and good until the 'One Size' doesn't fit your country. Today, banks are shutting down in Frankfurt and Germany is having a horrible time with its economy. Ireland's struggling too, but in a different way. And here is the key issue: there is nothing either of these countries can do. All power has been handed over to the European Central Bank (ECB) and the EU Commission to run these economies, and the ECB works behind closed doors and doesn't publish the minutes of their meetings for 16 years! This is hardly democracy and transparent accountability at work. The national politicians in these countries now have to go back to their electorates and say: "We know the economy hurts, but there's nothing we can do. Talk to Brussels."

ECLUB: But doesn't Britain need this single currency to be able to participate in trade with Europe?

PHILLIP DAY: This is what everyone is being told. "Britain in Europe makes sense!" "Britain not being in Europe would be a catastrophe from which we would never recover!" Firstly, if we calm everyone down and give them a drink of water, Britain IS part of Europe geographically, and there's nothing anyone can do about that. But Britain is a global trader, and herein lies her traditional strength. She was the first maritime power. Today Britain plays host to some of the world's most innovative and brilliant people of all races and creeds, who have contributed and are contributing to Britain being the fourth largest economy on the planet by GDP.

Now here are the facts: Only 35-40% of our business is actually with Europe, the rest is with America, Australia, Canada and others in the international community. What most people in the UK are not being told is that the vast majority of this international trade is what Brussels wants Britain to dump, since Britain's trading prowess has historically acted as a huge magnet, drawing trade away from our jealous continental neighbours.

So the continental powers want to muzzle Britain so they can dip their beaks into the trough of world trade instead of just being local players. It's really that simple. Again, most trusting Brits think the Eurozone is some sort of 'free trade area'. This is about as far from the truth as you can get. Witness what disgraced former EU commissioner Yves Thibault de Silguy had to say years ago: "If Economic and Monetary Union did not come about, in what a trap would we find ourselves?…. There would be a great danger of seeing Europe drift progressively towards a free-trade zone - precisely what we have been trying to avoid these past 25 years."

Europe today is a highly regulated economic prison surrounded by a Common External Tariff boundary strapped down tight with tens of thousands of binding directives which tell the citizens and their companies what they can and can't do. Any nation outside the EU wishing to access the 400 million-person market inside the European Union has to pay up for the privilege. This type of protectionist economics is why the EU is financially stagnant while Britain with its open, friendly and flexible trading patterns is thriving… at least for now. Credence stocks an excellent video by Trevor Coleman which explains all the details surrounding the euro.

ECLUB: So how would Britain fare outside the EU?

PHILLIP DAY: That's another key question. We can best answer that by looking at those countries who today remain outside, having made a conscientious decision to do so. Switzerland and Norway are doing very well and still retain their independence. Norway was told by the EU she would have to hand over her huge fishing industry as a 'shared' EU resource if she joined. Naturally, she didn't think too much of that and scuppered her own bid to join after a referendum. Today, she enjoys fishing her own waters, just as our fishermen could do again if Britain regained her independence.

The simple fact is, Britain pays out £1.3 million AN HOUR to be a part of a protectionist trading bloc that has destroyed our fishing and farming industries, all the while telling us what we can and can't do with our own money, some of which it returns to us in the form of 'subsidies'. The laughable part is that some Britons actually believe these are free 'hand-outs'! Britain, if our own politicians are able to stop rubbishing her for a moment, is the number one source for inward investment capital and is an economic powerhouse. When the workforce and industry work hand-in-hand (and this hasn't always been the case), this nation is the wealthiest on the planet in terms of standard of living.

But here's the kicker: We are also the EU's number one customer! The reason Brussels wants Britain in with the euro is that it truly opens Britain up for the rest of Europe to plunder. This is in Europe's interest, not ours. If we chose to regain our independence and leave the European Union, a free-trade agreement could easily be negotiated with the EU circumventing the Common External Tariff, there is no doubt in my mind about it, since the EU would naturally be keen to keep on the good side of their leading customer. The fact is, the EU is bleeding itself slowly to death with its protectionist attitude, which has been fostered over the years to protect the economic interests of its two axis powers, France and Germany. You don't have to look any further than the agricultural industry to see this happening.

ECLUB: Those directives you were mentioning also now include the Food Supplements Directive, which I know has upset those in Europe, who want to have the chance to choose their own nutritional supplements. What's your take on all this?

PHILLIP DAY: The FSD is simply Brussels doing what Brussels does best, and that is, writing legislation that minutely directs what people can and can't do inside the Eurozone. This is the traditional Continental way of doing things. The moves that are currently afoot to take away people's right to choose nutritional supplements they have traditionally used has been a rude awakening for many in Britain and elsewhere, but the EU means no harm or offence in this. This is just business in Brussels as usual. Those who want Britain to become a permanent, full addition to the new European state better get used to this way of doing things, because it isn't going to change.

ECLUB: Can public pressure have any effect on thwarting the Food Supplements Directive?

PHILLIP DAY: I sincerely doubt it. Lobbying Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) is next to useless, since they do not have the power to override the EU Commission, where the FSD originated. The EU Commission is soviet in style and is one of three powerful forums that dictate policy within the EU, the other two being the Council of Ministers and the European Council. Remember that some 400 million pieces of mail of various kinds were sent in to Brussels to protest the proposed FSD legislation, and they had little to no effect. MEPs simply do not have any power. Most of them only get to speak around 90 seconds a week in parliament. If they override their speaking time, their microphone is cut off.

ECLUB: So you think, then, that the British and European public's determination to fight the FSD itself is misguided?

PHILLIP DAY: Many alternative health organisations are blanching at the thought of losing significant revenues over this new legislation, and have formed alliances to 'fight the EU directive'. However, they do so in woeful ignorance of the simple fact that, with the European Union, they are no longer operating on a democratic, accountable field where their voice matters. Their mistake, and this is the crucial point being missed by many, is that they are confusing Brussels with people who actually give a damn about what the public think. So here it is again in case you missed it the first time: BRUSSELS DOESN'T CARE ABOUT YOUR SUPPLEMENTS!!! Brussels is simply doing what Brussels does, and is closing loopholes, working to standardise everything across its new European territory, and responding to corporate lobbying and plain paper envelopes from the drug industry in their usual way, all the while ruling their new fiefdom from behind closed and impenetrable doors. The public? What public? Former French prime minister Raymond Barre summed up the EU's attitude best when he said: "I have never understood why public opinion about European ideas should be taken into account."

ECLUB: So what IS the best course of action the public can take concerning the Food Supplements Directive?

PHILLIP DAY: The first thing is for all citizens concerned with the FSD to understand some plain facts of life about the European Union. Here they are:- Brussels doesn't recognise that you even have a right to complain about what it does. Get used to it. This is the Roman/Napoleonic system operating in Europe, as well as now in Britain. There is nothing you can do about any of this through what you perceive as 'traditional parliamentary channels'. There aren't any. The European parliament does not elect the European government, since the true power of the European government lies in the hands of those three powerful forums, the EU Commission, the European Council and the Council of Ministers. This is nothing like the parliamentary process by which Britain has been traditionally governed. Your politicians have been too cowardly to tell you that this is the state of affairs for Britain from here on in. Westminster is in the process of being gutted and has no power over any of this. European law has superseded UK law through the power of successive treaties our politicians have signed since 1972. The sooner everyone understands that it is the EU and the way it works that is the fundamental problem behind, not just the FSD, but many other areas of British concern, the wiser you will become.

ECLUB: That's a pretty bleak picture.

PHILLIP DAY: It's a true picture.

ECLUB: So, apart from understanding how the true land lies, what are the options open to those wanting to combat the FSD?

PHILLIP DAY: For European nations already fully part of EU integration, there is nothing they can do. They are now suffering the penalty of allowing their politicians to sign them and their nation into the European Union's way of doing things, which brooks no protest or dissention. For British citizens, there is some good news. We still have a window open to us to leave the European Union and regain our independence, and thus redress problems like the FSD through our own democratic parliamentary process. More about the independence angle in a moment. This window of opportunity will exist up to, but not beyond the point when we join the euro and achieve full economic union with Brussels. After this, it's all over and we will have to tolerate our new masters and their laws with no hope of redress.

The better news is that there are indications that there might be a delay in Britain taking on the euro based on the appalling economic problems Germany is presently enduring and the fact that the Labour Government's five economic tests cannot visibly be met to the satisfaction of British industry. This buys the British a little more time to get more of their people educated on what the European Union actually is and to initiate a series of direct, legal actions accordingly. Remember again that the EU would not be a problem if it had been set up as a true parliamentary democracy where the MEPs have the power to vote in the European government. If this were the case, then we could all go about fighting the FSD in the traditional way, through lobbying, demonstrations, placards, etc. BUT THIS IS NOT THE CASE!

ECLUB: Are there many in Britain who have woken up?

PHILLIP DAY: Yes. Polls seem to indicate that around 60% of the British people want to keep the pound, and this rises to 80% if the public could be reassured that Britain's long-term trade interests would not be harmed by leaving the EU. Of course they wouldn't. In spite of all the rubbish bandied about, Britain is a huge market, inside or out of the EU, and still a tempting cherry in the fruit bowl of world trade. The fact is, when Britain decided to postpone entering the euro, the level of inward investment into our country actually rose significantly!

People in this country are also waking up from their apathy to the extent that the EU has trod on their toes. For instance, many only had their rude awakening to what the EU is capable of after the Food Supplements Directive was passed. So, if you are upset with the Food Supplements Directive, then take heart! You have everything in common with those angry with what the EU has done to kill our fishing and agricultural industries. Our art marketeers, our metric martyrs, our financial sector workers and thousands of companies also have much in common with you, as they too are suffering the unwelcome bite of the New European Order.

There is one answer to all our woes and one answer only, and we must face it. We must leave the EU IMMEDIATELY, regain our independence, negotiate a free-trade agreement with the EU to keep both markets free and greased (which the EU cannot afford not to do), and then repeal those thousands of asinine laws, including the FSD, that have been progressively strangling this country and robbing her citizens of their customary freedoms.

ECLUB: What do you say to those people who think that this course is too late, futile, parochial, 'You can't fight City Hall', etc… and that withdrawal from the EU is never going to happen?

PHILLIP DAY: I would say that those people have fallen for the enemy's oldest trick in the book, and that is the concept of 'inevitability'. Everyone thought the same thing about the Nazis in 1938-39. "Oh, my God. There's nothing we can do! Better make the best of it!" Looking back, it's a good job this belief did not ultimately prevail and that Churchill was able to boot the country in the backside and get it busy.

ECLUB: Sounds like a classic 'British' problem!

PHILLIP DAY: Yes it is. Believing in inevitability is unfortunately a peculiarly British disease. I have a cure. WAKE UP NOW AND GET BUSY OR ELSE SUFFER WHAT YOU MUST SUFFER. It's the same message Churchill preached before the war, and the one I have been teaching the world over in the health realm to those who think their death is inevitable because of cancer, AIDS or some other problem. My answer? Your death WILL BE inevitable if you don't get off your backside now, get busy and get educated, and fast. EClub has been reporting on my activities for a few years. How many people have cheated, for example, the inevitability of their cancer death through not choosing to believe in the inevitability of the diagnosis their doctors gave them, who took the right action and took it consistently and lived? Hundreds, if not thousands. Who knows the number? And it's the same here.

ECLUB: And what do you say to those in this country who support Britain being part of the European Union?

PHILLIP DAY: I would ask: why do you support this? What actual benefits do you see Britain receiving? The majority of people who support Britain's continued membership of the EU (and there aren't as many as you might imagine) are ordinary, trusting souls who refuse to believe that what they have been told is rubbish and lies. No one likes to be fooled or hoodwinked. At first, the concept of quitting the EU seems extreme to these people simply because Europe, in its various EU guises, has been a part of British political and economic life since 1972. But then these people start considering the fact that this nation has been a free, independent country for 1,000 years, and has done very well, and many simply want this state of affairs to continue. Most just want to be in charge of their own fate and destiny… what's wrong with wanting that?

As Lord Pearson remarks, there is nothing 'right-wing', 'extreme', 'racist' or 'xenophobic' about wanting to retain our right to govern ourselves. It would indeed be a very healthy and inspiring thing to do, and we would recover a great deal of our national pride and honour by doing it.

ECLUB: But what about the EU diehards inside Britain?

PHILLIP DAY: There's a core of people in this country committed to overthrowing the British state by any and all means possible. They seek to introduce socialism/communism across Europe - in effect, Big Government, where the rulers take little or no heed of the people's needs and wishes. Many of these quislings can be found in the media, government, the civil service, the judiciary, the arts and other legitimate areas, burrowed into our institutions which have provided aid and comfort to these, our country's internal enemies. These people's only goal is towards establishing Big Government socialism/communism, which is actually what the EU is, in the plainest language, if you examine the way its institutions operate, as I have done.

The EU is the ideal manifestation of these people's desires for the future of Britain and this small but determined group of British fifth columnists, who hate the country of their birth and all she has stood for, has worked fiercely to see her demise. These people have been able very effectively to worm their way into powerfully leveraged positions of influence among us. We read their words in the newspapers each day. We watch their TV documentaries in the evening. Through their skills they have striven to make us apologise and feel embarrassed for our collective past. They have hamstrung our right to free speech, and have penetrated and corrupted our institutions. As I explain in my new book, in which I name names, these people deserve a traitor's contempt and shall deservedly find it.

Do not be deceived with what you are told about the EU. It represents a potentially profound threat to the stability and order of Europe and thus the world, and this is no exaggeration. It may all look cuddly and friendly at the moment, but much is being done to sprinkle the pixie dust to conceal the totalitarian reality of this New Order.

ECLUB: Give us an example.

PHILLIP DAY: Certainly. Remember I was talking earlier about checks and balances? Under Article 12 of Chapter 5 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the EU, a blanket, life-time immunity has been extended to all members of the EU's governing structure for all acts and deeds committed, and this includes the tens of thousands of bureaucrats and civil servants who run the union - all have been granted a lifetime immunity from prosecution for anything they do. This also goes for the new European police force, Europol, and the commanders and soldiers of the new European Army. All buildings, offices, records, archives and minutes belonging to the EU and its institutions are inviolate. They cannot be entered or inspected by the public. So all personnel serving the EU are above the law, as declared in the treaties which our successive politicians have signed on our behalf.

ECLUB: I imagine most people have no idea about that either?

PHILLIP DAY: Not a clue. An entity like the European Union, which has taken upon itself the task of removing all public scrutiny of its affairs, all media reporting of its forum meetings and which has expeditiously granted lifetime immunity from prosecution to all its personnel and officers for their future action and deeds - what can a government possibly want with such powers? Can such an entity not reasonably be expected in the future to exercise this awesome might and do bad things to its citizens with the likelihood that it will be able to get away with it? By the way, these are traditionally the same powers all totalitarian regimes have granted themselves before going to war with their own people and those of other nations. History has shown this repeatedly.

This, then, is the foreign governmental structure, dominated by France and Germany, which has gradually taken over Britain. The reader must decide whether any of these changes to the British way of life bode well for their own future.

ECLUB: You certainly have a fight on your hands. Do you think you'll win?

PHILLIP DAY: It's not up to me. It's up to the British people. I am an educator and researcher. My job and the job of my organisation is not to tell people how to vote or what to do, it is to equip them with the knowledge they need to make informed decisions that will affect their welfare and that of their loved ones. The politics I leave to others. Listen, if the vast majority of Britain decides it wants full economic integration with Europe, I will respect that, even though I may abhor it. But I do not want Britain to make such a weighty and momentous decision based on the lies, omissions and disinformation they are currently getting about the EU. I want them going into their future with their eyes wide open, so they know what they are taking on. That is the purpose of my new book.

ECLUB: Are you getting resistance to the Campaign for Truth in Europe?

PHILLIP DAY: Actually, we have had fantastic support since the launch. But to those reading this interview who may not agree with any of this, take heart also! Our country will do what our country will ultimately do. I truly believe this nation will get the destiny it deserves, one way or the other. But if the EU is to be Britain's fate for the future, then it will surely be the last democratic decision this country may take as an independent nation, and we mustn't grumble or complain down the road when we realise the enormous and hideous implications of the destiny we have chosen to embrace for ourselves.

ECLUB: And the alternative?

PHILLIP DAY: The alternative is to wake up, realise how close we came to losing it all. And then regain our freedom through the proper channels and take up our right again to choose our own destiny as a strong, vibrant, flexible, powerful, independent and FAIR nation. I know which one I'd sooner live in.

ECLUB: Phillip Day - thank you.

PHILLIP DAY: You're most welcome.

ECLUB FOOTNOTE: Phillip Day's new book is 'Ten Minutes to Midnight', published by Credence, and is due out on 1st February 2003, in time for the start of his 'Let's Fix Britain!' tour, which starts in Milton Keynes on 3rd February 2003. Advanced orders can now be placed for this book through Credence Publications. Credence also sells Ashley Mote's excellent and more in-depth treatment on the subject, entitled 'Vigilance'. This can be obtained also from the Credence bookstore at www.credence.org.

If you want more information on the issues discussed in this interview, please visit the new Campaign for Truth in Europe web-site. If you are not currently a member of the Campaign for Truth in Medicine or our sister organisation, the Campaign for Truth in Europe, you can join both FOR FREE today by clicking here and submitting your membership form to us in the strictest confidence. Your free membership will entitle you to our Health Review magazine and the regular EClub bulletins.

More detail on Phillip's forthcoming tour and Internet ticketing can be found by clicking here. Tickets will be available for purchase after Christmas Day and can also be obtained by calling the UK ticket line on (01622) 832386.