![]() |
||||
| Back to Eclub Navigator | ||||
|
FDA Scientists Report Bush Administration Pressure to Falsify Scientific Data & Procedures & Lie to Public PRESS RELEASE WASHINGTON - July 20 - The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) today released survey results that demonstrate pervasive and dangerous political influence of science at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Of the 997 FDA scientists who responded to the survey, nearly one-fifth (18.4 percent) said that they "have been asked, for non-scientific reasons, to inappropriately exclude or alter technical information or their conclusions in a FDA scientific document." This is the third survey UCS has conducted to examine inappropriate interference with science at federal agencies. "Science must be the driving force for decisions made at the FDA. These disturbing survey results make it clear that inappropriate interference is putting people in harm's way," said Dr. Francesca Grifo, Senior Scientist and Director of UCS's Scientific Integrity Program. "FDA leaders should act now to improve transparency and accountability and renew respect for independent science at the agency." The UCS survey, which was co-sponsored by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, was sent to 5,918 FDA scientists. Forty percent of respondents fear retaliation for voicing safety concerns in public. This fear, scientists say, combines with other pressures to compromise the agency's ability to protect public health and safety. More than a third of the respondents did not feel they could express safety concerns even inside the agency. "This is more than just a bureaucratic problem within the agency," said Kim Witczak, WoodyMatters.com, who lost her husband due to side-effects of a dangerous anti-depressant. "It has real human impacts which can be devastating. My husband paid the ultimate price for FDA's lack of accountability." The survey also revealed
other compelling points of concern: "The FDA regulates products vital to the well-being of all Americans, including food, drugs, vaccines, and medical devices," said Dr. Grifo. "To fully protect public health and safety, the FDA must have the best available independent scientific data." To address the concerns raised by FDA scientists,
UCS Accountability: FDA leadership must face consequences if they side with commercial or political interests and not with the American people. Transparency: Scientific research and reviews should be open so any undue manipulation is immediately apparent. Protection: Safeguards must be put in place for all government scientists who speak out. "What we see at the FDA, while dramatic and
frightening, is all too common at many federal agencies," said
Dr. Grifo. "All federal scientists need protections so they can
speak out when their science is manipulated, and all federal agencies
need fully functioning independent advisory committees. FDA leadership
must understand and support independent science and it is up to Congress
to hold them accountable." Straight to the Source PRESS RELEASE
|
||||