CHEMOTHERAPY NOT THE ANSWER?

Dear Sir,

In today's Review Dr James Le Fanu writes:

"The present situation, where virtually all cancer patients receive chemotherapy at a cost of billions of pounds a year even though it is of limited efficacy, will continue - the only difference being that in future the cancer drugs will cost yet more billions."

There could be no more damning indictment of Western allopathic medicine in general and the British NHS in particular. Even the "limited efficacy" of chemotherapy is challenged by many sources, including the Lancet, which has stated that chemotherapy may well do more harm than good. (Full details available).

The situation is doubly tragic because the means of prevention of all cancers has been known for at least fifty years. Also in virtually all cases should timely preventative action not have been taken, then cancer can be controlled cheaply and effectively without recourse to surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy.

I am not myself a medical doctor, however I believe that these statements certainly are proven on the basis of probability and perhaps even beyond reasonable doubt. I base my case solely on the evidence of medical doctors, including leading oncologists worldwide, and biochemists. Anyone interested in judging the facts for themselves can be sent a detailed information pack. Sadly however the establishment and the media seem to have joined with the medical profession and the pharmaceutical companies and indeed the Government in a cynical conspiracy to suppress this information. So will the Telegraph have the courage to publish this letter?

I am a retired Naval Officer and have no financial or other interest in any aspect of medical care or alternatives to the present (unsuccessful) conventional treatments. I write solely in an attempt to prevent the same sad fate and unnecessary death happening to others as has been the lot of so many of my relations and friends.

Yours Sincerely

Geoffrey J. Sherman
Commander, Royal Navy
GJTSherman@aol.com