![]() |
||||
| Back to Eclub Navigator | ||||
|
Euro-Army Should Fill Us with Fear
As the running of the eurozone sinks into chaos, with its largest economy - Germany - mired in recession, the EU now seems to be making the wrong kind of progress in all directions. A report by the pan-European business organisation Eurochambres predicts that, on current projections, the EU economy will only catch up with the present performance of the American economy by 2056 - and even that is dependent on the improbable condition that the EU's productivity grows at an annual rate 0.5 per cent faster than that of the United States. Meanwhile Nick Witney, the former senior Ministry of Defence official who now heads the new European Defence Agency, last week wrote to The Telegraph to deny my report that he is playing a key role in building up an "EU defence identity" separate from both NATO and the USA. Mr Witney must hope that we don't read his evidence to a House of Lords committee last year in which he agreed that his agency's purpose is to promote the European Security and Defence Policy, whose objective is a "European defence identity". It was disingenuous of him to claim in his letter that he is only concerned with co-ordinating defence procurement. Nowadays, as he well knows, it is precisely the nature of the armed forces' electronics and weapons systems that dictates who they can fight alongside. At the centre of EU defence planning is the Future Rapid Effects System (FRES) which will create a family of vehicles and weapons systems co-ordinated through the EU's GALILEO satellite programme. If the British Army is reorganised around FRES, as Mr Witney's former ministry wants, it will be equipped to fight alongside other EU forces, but not alongside the Americans. The real danger Britain now faces, through our breakneck
integration with the EU's defence and procurement policy, is that our
Armed Forces may soon be as effective as the Growth and Stability Pact.
And that will be no joke at all. |
||||