![]() |
||||
| Back to Eclub Navigator | ||||
|
Dr Reid Stays Strangely Silent Last week demonstrated how absurdly easy it has become for John Reid, our Secretary of State for Defence, to conceal what is now his department's central policy: the stealthy integration of Britain's defences with those of the EU, wasting billions of pounds. On Thursday, following warnings from two of Britain's best-known former military commanders that this policy of integration is potentially disastrous, Dr Reid put out a silly statement denying that he had any such policy - on the very day he was hosting a meeting of 25 EU defence ministers to agree another major step towards integration. Yet this was almost wholly missed by the media, whose attention was otherwise focussed on a report by MPs which appeared to direct devastating criticism at the waste and inefficiency of the Ministry of Defence's procurement policy, while avoiding any mention of the main reason for this - namely the MoD's switch from US and British to EU-made equipment, at far greater cost. The meeting of EU defence ministers chaired by Dr Reid
at RAF Lyneham on Thursday yet again confirmed what this column has been
reporting for months: that British defence is in the middle of a historic
and potentially catastrophic realignment, away from our "special
relationship" with the US and towards the integration of our
Armed Forces' equipment and command structures with those of our EU "partners".
As was revealed after the meeting by Javier Solana, the EU's foreign and
security policy chief (although not by Dr Reid), the ministers agreed
in effect to suspend Article 296 of the EU Treaty, which allows members
to protect their own arms industries by not allowing other countries to
bid for their defence contracts. For some time now Britain has been leading the way
in this respect, by awarding a succession of major arms contracts to other
EU countries, as is analysed in detail in a new Centre for Policy Studies
paper by Dr Richard North. Trenchantly endorsing all it says, the foreword
to Dr North's paper, "The Wrong Side of the Hill: the secret realignment
of UK defence policy", is by Major-General Julian Thompson, commander
of British Land Forces in the Falklands. Following its publication, and a similar warning from
Colonel Tim Collins, hero of the advance on Basra, Dr Reid put out a strangely
thin and disingenuous statement, calling Dr North's paper "deeply
misleading and potentially very damaging". There was no policy
of integration with the EU, he claimed. The "special relationship"
is alive and well. By way of proof, he cited seven major projects. Four
are based on long-standing arrangements with the US, and soon to end.
The other three are EU projects which, along with many others, exemplify
the very policy that Dr Reid denies. What made this even odder was a report the same day
by the Commons Public Accounts Committee which excoriated several MoD
procurement projects, but omitted the main reason why they have gone so
wrong. The MPs were highly critical, for instance, of the £5 billion
contract to build six Type-45 destroyers. But they failed to notice that
the MoD could have saved £2.4 billion by basing their ships on a
proven US design, with better missiles. The MoD only wasted this vast
sum through its determination to arm the ships with French missiles. The failure of both MPs and media to see the scale
of what is afoot - and our Government's duplicity in trying to hide it
- has become a national scandal. Now the facts are available, in Dr North's
paper, it is time more people followed the lead given by two of our most
respected military men and woke up to what is going on. Further Resources The Real
Face of the European Union by Phillip Day, video documentary
(PAL format only) Click
here to purchase or review any of the above. |
||||