|
CTM
Eclub digest version, October27th 2003
|
||||
|
Party 'Must be Committed to Leave EU Constitution'
The Conservative Party has called for a referendum on the constitution, which is under negotiation between member states. But Lord Lamont, the former chancellor, and David Heathcote-Amory, a former minister, said that if Britain adopted the constitution before the party got into power, a future Conservative government should withdraw. "We have to concentrate our efforts on making sure we get a referendum," Lord Lamont told a fringe meeting organised by the Bruges Group. But if that failed, Mr Duncan Smith should make it clear that the constitution would be part of a general "re-negotiation" of Britain's position within the EU once the Tories were in government, Lord Lamont said. In his speech, Lord Lamont compared the ceremony held by the former French President, Valery Giscard D'Estang to mark the unveiling of the proposed constitution with an event organised by Nazi Germany. "When the conclusions for that convention were unveiled, it was an enormous fanfare, the champagne flowed, there had been nothing like it since the field of the cloth of gold," he said. "President Giscard stood ram-rod to attention while in a ceremony reminiscent of the German Democratic Republic or the Third Reich, the 'Ode to Joy' was played. President Giscard was even compared to Socrates." Mr Heathcote-Amory, the Tory representative on the convention that drew up the draft constitution, said: "If we accept this, we will be submitting ourselves formally and irreversibly to a superior political authority, something we have never done." Robert Oulds, director of the Bruges Group, called on Mr Duncan Smith to sever all contact between Tory MEPs and the People's European Party, the pro-Brussels conservative group in the European Parliament to which the Tories are presently linked. "Then we can start the process of building
our opposition to the federalists and perhaps even change the course of
Europe," he said. PHILLIP DAY'S COMMENT: After Sweden and Denmark's refusal to join the European single currency by popular mandate, Tony Blair has lost all impetus in trying to take Britain into the euro this side of a general election. The proposed EU constitution he is trying to foist onto the British public without their approbation however is an entirely different, and much more serious matter. To his credit, 'Socrates' D'Estaing has made it clear that if Britain does not want to be part of the new European political state, she can withdraw, sign a free trade agreement, and trade independently as the EU's biggest customer. Giscard D'Estaing naturally knows that the new United States of Europe is on a hide into nowhere if the population of Europe is against the idea of political union (which many are), which is why he supports referenda on the issue in the nations involved. Of all the premiers in Europe, Tony Blair remains conspicuously alone in denying his country a referendum on the constitution. He wants to be president of Europe, but knows his country won't vote to lose its independence to a corrupt, supranational organisation. Thus Britain is to be compelled into yielding her sovereignty to a foreign power over which the British people have little control. Further, Prime Minister Blair insists on giving aid and comfort to our previous enemies by encouraging the handing over of our army, navy, air force and sovereign powers to them. He has no popular mandate, or indeed the political right, to do this. Under the 1848 Treason Felonies Act, Tony Blair and other key members of his cabinet should be charged with treason. For those wishing to learn what can be done to prevent Britain sliding into a future European financial insolvency and resultant anarchy (Germany herself is perilously close to economic meltdown at the present time because of the euro), may I recommend the two titles below, which explain the situation and the courses of action that may be taken. This has nothing to do with party politics. This has everything to do with the kind of world you and your family will inhabit tomorrow. Further resources Available through www.credence.org Pig Ignorant Zac Goldsmith, the editor of The Ecologist and son of the late Sir James Goldsmith, keeps a herd of pigs on his farm in Devon. For some years, whenever he has wanted to convert one into pork chops for his family table, he has called in a professional slaughterman, one of thousands put out of work when John Selwyn Gummer's bizarre interpretation of an EC meat directive made it too expensive for most of Britain's rural abattoirs to stay in business. Recently, however, the farm was visited by an official of the State Veterinary Service who said that, on the advice of Sir John Kreb's Food Standards Agency, this was no longer permitted. According to the FSA, the slaughterman was supplying the meat "for sale", which was against European rules. The only person who could be permitted to kill was the farmer himself. Apart from the obvious point that the slaughterman
is not supplying the meat, but only his services, it seems that, according
to the FSA's reading of EC hygiene rules, it is perfectly all right for
an inexperienced, untrained farmer to kill animals for human consumption,
but for a qualified expert to do the job is a criminal offence. Mr Goldsmith
looks forward to seeing how Sir John Krebs will defend this.
EU Bans Straw Pond Cleaner Barley straw, a centuries old remedy for clearing murky pond water, is to be effectively banned under a European Union directive - because no one knows how it works! Producers say that the only way to escape the ban on barley "patches", sold in most garden centres, is to explain why they work and demonstrate that no harm is caused. However, the expense of doing so would force them out of business. The EU law on biocidal products, about to come into force, is part of the regulation of pesticides. However, it does not distinguish between manufactured and natural products. The Health and Safety Executive said it was taking
up the issue with the EU. Pills Issued as Nuclear Sub Arrives Schools near a port where a nuclear submarine has docked, have been issued with protective medication as a precautionary measure against a radiation leak. More than 160,000 potassium iodate tablets have been distributed in and around Portsmouth following the arrival of the 18-year-old Trafalgar class submarine, Torbay, for exercises. The tablets, to be taken only in an emergency, prevent the onset of thyroid cancer. The pills have been issued for the first time to 31 schools and the city's university and art college by Hampshire County Council, in accordance with new legislation. Martyn Powell, the emergency planning officer for the council, said: "The worst scenario is for gamma radiation to leak into the atmosphere from the vessel. This does not have a fatal effect but can cause cancer of the thyroid gland about 30 years down the line. Obviously the pills will only be handed out in the very unlikely event of a leak." Marilyn Mullen, Head Teacher of Alverstoke Junior School
in Gosport, said: "I have been told I will be contacted and given
instructions on what to do in an emergency. These precautions have been
handled very efficiently and we have no concerns at all."
The Thyroid and Fluoride
This is the sixth in a series of 14 bulletins in which I will be focusing on public health warnings on fluoridation which are being ignored by public health officials as well as many non-governmental organizations otherwise engaged in protecting the public health. I urge you to forward this, and the other public health warnings to your local, provincial or federal health officials and ask them for their response. Copy your letter to your state and federal representatives and get them engaged in your discussions, especially if you sense you are getting the run around from the health officials. Public Health Warning on Fluoridation, 6: The thyroid gland and fluoride. The literature dealing with the interaction between fluoride and the thyroid gland has a very long history, stretching back to a paper written in 1854 by Maumene who linked goiter in dogs with exposure to fluoride. The following URL links to a summary of that history http://64.177.90.157/pfpc/html/thyroid_history.html I do not pretend to know enough about either this history or the detailed functioning of the thyroid gland to offer much insight into this issue. However, it is an extremely important area and it warrants far more attention from governments promoting fluoridation than it currently receives, which is practically zero! Millions of Americans are impacted by thyroid dysfunction, and if only a small fraction of these have their condition caused by, or worsened by, fluoride it is a very serious matter indeed. There are four important lines of evidence that fluoride interferes with the thyroid gland. 1) The condition known as "goiter" which involves a gross swelling of the thyroid gland, which in turn produces very marked swellings in the neck, is known to be caused by iodine deficiency. However, it has also been found to occur in areas where there are adequate supplies of iodine, but where there's an excess fluoride in the water. 2) Starting in the 1930s and continuing through to the late 1950's sodium fluoride was used to lower the activity of the thyroid gland for those suffering from hyperthyroidism (i.e. over active thyroid gland). The obvious question then becomes, if fluoride lowers the activity of an overactive thyroid gland what does it do to a normal or underactive thyroid gland? 3) It has been known for a long time that one of the consequences of iodine deficiency in mothers is an increased risk of mental retardation in their children. With the advent of iodized salt, this is a less frequent occurrence in industrialized countries. However, studies from China indicate that even a moderate amount of fluoride exposure can exacerbate the effects of low iodide's impacts on the developing brain. 4) It has been known for a long time that fluoride mimics the action of the thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH). Because TSH sends its message across the cell membrane of the thyroid gland via G-proteins, a candidate mechanism for fluoride's action would be fluoride's well established ability (See reviews by Strunecka & Patocka, 1999; and Li, 2003), in the presence of a trace amount of aluminium, to switch on G-proteins. Taking these lines of evidence one at a time. 1) Endemic Goiter (also spelled goitre) and fluoride. In a 90 page report entitled "Endemic Goitre in the Union of South Africa and some Neighbouring Territories", prepared for the Department of Nutrition for the South African government, Dr. Douw Steyn and colleagues concluded that there were two separate causes for endemic goiter. In their summary, they state, "In the Union of South Africa endemic goitre is caused by: (1) a primary iodine deficiency in the drinking water and soil, and most probably in the food; and (2) excessive quantities of fluorine in subterranean drinking-water in spite of super sufficiency of iodine in the waters." (See http://www.slweb.org/south-africa.goitre.html ) The areas with endemic goiter caused by excess fluoride were located in the Northwest part of South Africa. In 1999, Jooste et al repeated Steyn's findings when they reported endemic goiter in the absence of iodine deficiency in schoolchildren of the Northern Cape Province. A similar relationship between excess fluoride exposure and goiter has been reported in England (Wilson 1941), in the Punjab region of India (Wilson 1941), in Nepal (Day and Powell-Jackson, 1972) and in Gujarat, India (Desai 1993). Other studies, however, have failed to find this relationship (see Burgi 1984).
What is striking about the doses of fluoride used to treat hyperthyroidism is how small they were. Galletti and Joyet (1958) found that a daily dose of just 2.3-4.5 mg of fluoride per day was enough to reduce the basal metabolism rate (BMR) of hyperthyroid patients and alleviate their condition (see paper at http://www.fluoridealert.org/galletti.htm ). This dose (2.3-4.5 mg/day) will be exceeded by many people living in a fluoridated area. The US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS,1991) estimates that an adult in a fluoridated community receives between 1.6 and 6.6 mg of fluoride per day from all sources combined. In a World Health Organization review (Fluoride and Health, WHO, 1970), Semole cites evidence from Korrodi et al (1956) that, in normal human subjects, fluorides have no effect on the thyroid. He then asks, "Why does sodium fluoride exert a mild antithyroidal effect in hyperthyroidic patients if it is inactive in normal persons? Nobody knows." However, the claim that fluoride has no effect on normal thyroid function may have been premature. According to a study conducted by Bachinskii (1985), prolonged consumption of water with 2.3 ppm fluoride produced changes in thyroid function, not only in people with hyperthyroidism but in people with normal thyroid function as well. Bachinskii writes in the abstract of his paper: "Altogether 123 persons were examined: 47 healthy persons, 43 patients with thyroid hyperfunction and 33 with thyroid hypofunction. It was established that prolonged consumption of drinking water with a raised fluorine content (122 +/- 5 mumol/l with the normal value of 52 +/- 5 mumol/l) by healthy persons caused tension of function of the pituitary-thyroid system that was expressed in TSH elevated production, a decrease in the T3 concentration and more intense absorption of radioactive iodine by the thyroid as compared to healthy persons who consumed drinking water with the normal fluorine concentration. The results led to a conclusion that excess of fluorine in drinking water was a risk factor of more rapid development of thyroid pathology." Unfortunately, Bachinskii's full study was published in Russian, and we do not have a translation. However, it would be an easy matter for any government to get a translation of this work and to pursue the details of this study and repeat it if there is any doubt in the matter. 3. Lowering of IQ in China. It is well established that the pituitary/thyroid system is important in the early mental development of children thus if fluoride interfered with the thyroid it could, among other things, result in lowered IQ in children. In this respect, the results of a UNICEF sponsored study of mental retardation, IQ and thyroid hormone status in children in areas endemically low in iodide are particularly revealing. Lin Fa-Fu et al. (1991) found in one region of China that even a modest amount of fluoride in the water (i.e. 0.91 ppm versus 0.34 ppm) led to an even greater reduction in IQ and the frequency of mental retardation, than simply low iodide by itself. (See paper at http://www.fluoridealert.org/idd.htm ) Yang et al (1994) further investigated the effect of iodide and fluoride on IQ and hormonal status in areas of high iodide and high fluoride. From their study the authors concluded that their results "indicate that high iodine and high fluorine exert severe damage to human body." Compared to controls, children had higher dental fluorosis rates; markedly lower iodine-131 uptake; higher serum TSH levels, and slightly lower average IQ, with 16.7% placed in a category labelled "low intelligent." We only have the abstract in English, the rest of the paper is in Chinese. 4. TSH, fluoride and G-proteins. Just how fluoride impacts the thyroid gland is not clear. We know that, in the presence of a trace amount of aluminium, fluoride switches on G-proteins, thus sending messages normally delivered by water soluble hormones. TSH is one of the water soluble hormones which is mimicked by aluminium fluoride. But the puzzling thing about this is that one would expect that this would lead to an activation of the thyroid gland not deactivation (as in the case of someone with hypothyroidism). A clue to this puzzle may have come in 1994 in a paper by Tezelmann et al. These researchers using Chinese hamster ovary cells, report that fluoride increases intracellular cAMP concentration (the secondary messenger produced as a result of switching on G-proteins), but the end result was desensitisation of the receptor for the thyroid stimulating hormone (TSHr). In other words, the fluoride begins by stimulating the cell but the end result was that it led the cell to become less responsive to the normal stimulation by TSH. The authors state that, "Desensitisation or decreased response to the same (homologous) or other stimuli (heterologous) is a well known process. Homologous desensitisation to TSH has been demonstrated in normal thyroid tissue." I will be returning to the activation of G-proteins in a later health warning as well as its ability to lower IQ in another. Meanwhile, various recent government sponsored reviews have given this topic very short shrift. The York Review (McDonagh et al., 2000) looked at only two of the goiter studies (Jooste, 1999 and Gedalia, 1963). They didn't use a weight of evidence approach, bringing in the clinical and biochemical studies above. The Irish Fluoridation Forum (2002) didn't do any review of primary studies on health except dental fluorosis and four bone fracture studies. The CDC (1999) reviewed no health studies beyond citing the NRC (1993) review and the NRC(1993) review didn't consider impacts on the thyroid system, nor did the First draft of the WHO review (Environmental Health Criteria 227: Fluorides, 2002). I welcome any corrections or comments, especially if readers know of any government review since WHO (1970) that has discussed fluoride's impact on the thyroid gland.
Subject: GM and Toxins in Our Food Chain
Forward to: Various Newspapers Dear Prime Minister Helen Clark I am a member of the public and a consumer, writing to express my very deep, deep concern regarding GM and other toxins in our food chain. Being a Commonwealth Citizen and residing in England, on occasions I also draw this matter to the attention of the Prime Minister of Britain. However, the world is my home and every single person is important and needs to be aware of how this issue affects them and all the other animals and plants that are in co-habitation with us. The public at large is not aware of the quantity of pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, growth inhibitors for storage purposes and growth promoters for ripening, etc. that is sprayed onto our so-called healthy fruit and vegetables before they get to our mouths. We are also misguided into believing that a lot of highly processed foods are healthy for us. In short we are being poisoned and nutritionally starved at the same time. In Australia, Dr Donahoe who talked about 'farm chemicals in our food' on the Today Tonight - Channel 7 News, was quite explicit about their harmful effects on humans. Refer back to an article in the NZ Herald on 22 August 2003, entitled 'Test for low-spray onions brings 1500 submissions'. Some of the statements in this article follow: · "Farmers use a battery of up to 15
different herbicides to control the weeds. Many are more toxic and longer
lasting than glyphosate."
Quote "5000 ha of GM crops were grown throughout the world in 1996. This ballooned to 45 million hectares of herbicide-resistant crops last year. Source: Crop & Food Research" Unquote Wow !! That is one big announcement of the quantity of poison being sprayed. Along with our food being poisoned, so is our land and down through into our water-ways. Ask Councils, they would be able to give you a better idea of problems associated with storm water drains, farm trenches, etc. leaching pollutants through into our environment. Refer to the famous Canadian Doctor, Jonn Matsen, whose medical breakthroughs help prevent and cure formerly incurable diseases. In his book entitled 'Mysterious Causes & Cures of Illness - How to overcome every disease from constipation to cancer without any drugs or surgery' he explains in layman's terms the workings of the body and opens your eyes as to why we have such overloaded hospital waiting lists. I quote excerpts from his book: "poor diet and faulty digestion can result in incomplete absorption of nutrients and a build-up of toxins in the blood, which can overload the liver and circulate throughout the body causing irritation. If the immune system gets overloaded, more serious problems can result." "Disease begins with faulty digestion long before the first aches and pains, long before there are any symptoms." (Ref: Dr Jonn Matsen, 'Mysterious Causes & Cures of Illness') Of course you would have to read his book to fully understand the reasons why we develop faulty digestive systems in the first place. Dr Matsen quotes in his book the two rather interesting excerpts as follows: 1st Thomas Sydenham, the famous seventeenth century English physician, summed up disease with this statement: "Disease is nothing else but an attempt on the part of the body to rid itself of morbific matter." 2nd In his book 'The Wheel of Health' Dr. G.T. Wrench wrote: "Diseases only attack those whose outer circumstances, particularly food, are faulty...The prevention and banishment of disease are primarily matters of food; secondarily, of suitable conditions of environment. Antiseptics, medicaments, inoculations, and extirpating operations evade the real problem. Disease is the censor pointing out the humans, animals and plants who are imperfectly nourished." (Ref: Dr Jonn Matsen, 'Mysterious Causes & Cures of Illness') It was enlightening for me to meet and talk with Mr Peter Pavlovich the owner of Stonemeal New Zealand, who took time out to explain what happens in nature to replenish the soil with minerals which beneficial bacteria feed on and in turn whose excretions feed the plants so they become strong and hardy (due to proper natural nutrition) and resistant to bugs and very nutritious for animal and human consumption. His industry is a natural method of bringing back into order our food chain that has gone drastically wrong through human interference by our industrial revolution. He is currently supplying stonemeal to some farmers and if we are wise we will not interfere with nature by introducing more problems of pollution for her to deal with and in turn should look at eradicating poisons to assist her in cleaning up our environment. If you look very carefully mother-nature is very intricate, and when we upset her balance she retaliates - one case we can see is with diseases. As far as bugs are concerned they are part of our food chain, you poison them, you poison us, and that is exactly what is happening. Phillip Day, Health Researcher and Reporter for Credence Publications in Kent, England, refers to one of his books as follows: "In Health Wars, we examine key features of the body's metabolic requirements for food. These axiomatic truths have been confirmed through the outstanding nutrition and physical condition of certain peoples on Earth who, in their native state, do not suffer the same legacy of disease and ill-health currently plaguing industrialised societies. Put simply, as we become more technologically advanced, so increases our temptation to fiddle with our food, water and air in our efforts to bring 'science' to a new plane of understanding and profitability. That this tinkering is in fact one of the chief causes of disease and misery today is widely ignored or trivialised by the arrogance of industry and our (mostly unhealthy) scientific peers, who seem to ignore the fact that while our world changes constantly around us (and often not for the best), our bodies still crave the same nutrients they always did." (Ref: Phillip Day, 'Food for Thought', Credence Publications). From an article called "Tampering with Creation" in the NZ Herald on 23-24 August 2003, where Science Reporter Simon Collins looks into the latest state of play on GM; I quote the following excerpt: "and to insert into crops a protein made by the soil bacteria Bucillus Thuringiensis, or Bt, which kills harmful insects that try to eat, the crop." The first question I would be asking is - if it kills harmful insects and because of the unnatural way of impregnation into plants, would it kill the good flora or bugs / digestive enzymes in our bodies too? However, under the heading 'Is it safe?' the article
goes on to say "Michael Meacher, the British Environment Minister
who was sacked in June for expressing fears about GM food, points to evidence
that: Rats fed on GM potatoes by Dr Arpad Pusztai at Scotland's Rowett
Research Institute sometimes developed changes in their gut structure
and reduced immune responsiveness to harmful agents compared with rats
fed on ordinary Further on in the article it says "Pusztai's research was not finished because he was sacked after voicing concern about testing procedures for GM foods. No one has ever repeated his study." According to an article on 19 August 2003 in the NZ Herald, there are about 14 countries now growing GM crops on a commercial basis. We are a small country separated from the others by large masses of water; it would be prudent to use this to our advantage by: · Keeping GM as far away as possible. In other words, we could be the only clean, GM free country left in the world capable of turning things around, by providing other countries with natural seeds and plants, and organic produce. As a matter of interest I was told that our country already has a specialised breeding programme for rare species of animals from around the world; we even exported back to Australia their white-crested Wallabies when they were dying out. Dr Jonn Matsen, Mr Phillip Day and Mr Peter Pavlovich, are all experts in their fields and humanitarians who could give valuable advice on how to get our world and health back on track. It is my request and recommendation that before any decision is made on any type of GM, that Government seeks the advice / consultation with the experts mentioned above. Every single person's life depends on our food chain, therefore - careful, knowledgeable and wise consideration is necessary. Dr Samuel Epstein, Chairman of the Cancer Prevention Coalition, endorses my concerns with regard to GM and toxins. Regards Lesley Fairthorne Inflammatory Bowel Disease Profile I am lumping a group of conditions together here as Inflammatory Bowel Disease, since the remedies for them are essentially the same. Once the reader appreciates what these conditions are and how they are caused, the answer to most of the problems becomes straightforward enough to implement. Crohn's Disease (Regional enteritis): Pain in
the lower right abdomen, malabsorption of nutrients, low-grade fever,
weight-loss, flatulence. Crohn's is a condition where segments of the
colon (large intestine) become inflamed, thickened and ulcerated. Traditional
treatments will include corticosteroids, antibiotics, immunosuppressive
drugs and dietary changes. Crohn's can cause partial blockage of the large
intestine, causing pain and bouts of diarrhoea. The same condition occurring
in the small intestine is known as regional enteritis, the chronic form
of which may also create fistulae (unnatural joinings) between adjacent
loops of the intestines or between bowel tissue and the bladder, vagina
or skin. Enzymes ejected from these organisms (known as decarboxylases) work on the chyme, converting the amino acids histadine to histamine (hence 'allergic' reactions sometimes treated with 'anti-histamines'), ornithine to putrescine and lysine to cadaverine. Actions of these products, known as vasoactive amines, will stir up a host of the problems we are examining in this chapter. These fungi and yeasts are responsible for many apparent food allergies. Proteins, such gluten from wheat and barley and casein from cow's milk, may also damage intestinal structure, bringing on some conditions. Take action · DIET: COMMENCE THE ANTI-CANDIDA DIETARY
REGIMEN Herxheimer's reaction Further Resources Available through www.credence.org
The Fungal Etiology of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, although distinguished by well-known characteristics, are collectively known as inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). IBD is characterized by a host of symptoms such as diarrhoea, abdominal cramps, rectal bleeding, weight loss, fever, and a host of extra-intestinal symptoms, including disorders of the eyes, liver, gallbladder, muscles and joints, kidneys, and skin.1 The treatments usually focus on relief of symptoms with anti-inflammatory drugs or surgery (i.e. removal of the affected part of the intestines). The cause of IBD remains "unknown." Some have implicated a viral etiology to IBD. In the medical journal The Lancet,2 Dr. Wakefield and colleagues found that three of four offspring in mothers that had measles during pregnancy developed severe Crohn's later in life. Of note is that recurrent antibiotic-resistant pneumonia preceded the Crohn's in every case. This is important because antibiotics are known to increase the risk of fungal infection.3 Another study highlights this fact: an eight-year-old girl who was treated with antibiotics for recurrent upper respiratory tract infections developed intestinal candidiasis, an overgrowth of the yeast Candida albicans, in the gut.4 Other scientists have found carbohydrates to be a possible culprit. Two of three worldwide studies found the average intake of carbohydrates (including bread, potatoes, and refined sugars) to be much greater in those who developed IBD than in those who did not.5 Why would carbohydrates be implicated as a cause? Could it be that they are commonly contaminated with fungal toxins, according to a 2002 JAMA article and numerous agricultural publications, including the Council for Agricultural Science and Technology? 6, 7 In her book, "Breaking the Vicious Cycle,"
Elaine Gottschall describes the cycle of intestinal mucosal injury, impaired
digestion, malabsorption, bacterial overgrowth, and increase in bacterial
by-products and mucous production, which lead back to intestinal mucosal
injury. We all know that antibiotics can alter the normal intestinal flora
or bacteria. These bacteria usually keep in check the relatively small
amount of existing yeast in the intestines. When fungi become systemic from gut inflammation and the overuse of antibiotics, you can see how the whole body--again, the eyes, liver, gallbladder, muscles and joints, kidneys, and skin--becomes involved in inflammatory bowel disease. Still other scientists have directly implicated yeast and fungal toxins, called mycotoxins, in the cause of Crohn's disease. Former World Health Organization expert Dr. A.V. Costantini has found that people with Crohn's often have aflatoxin, a mycotoxin made by Aspergillus molds, in their blood. Barclay found that disease activity in patients with Crohn's was lower while they followed a yeast-free diet, specifically avoiding baker's and brewer's yeasts. Some feel that the yeast, Candida albicans, may be the cause of Celiac disease, also known as Sprue, or gluten-sensitive enteropathy.10 Celiac disease, doctors presume, is caused by a reaction to a protein particle called gluten that exists in certain grains. This allergic-type reaction leads to inflammation and often severe symptoms in not only the intestines but also the entire body. Conventional treatment therefore involves suppressing the inflammation and symptoms with anti-inflammatory medications. It also requires the avoidance of these particular grains. Ironically, corn is a grain that does not contain gluten. It therefore falls in the "okay to eat" list offered by conventional practitioners and dieticians. Little do most practitioners know that corn is universally contaminated with mycotoxins. So, over-consuming corn, as so many Celiac patients do since they have few other choices of grains in their diet, is likely to propagate the illness. Many people have successfully treated (dare we say cured?) their Celiac disease by not only avoiding grains altogether--especially corn--but also including antifungal medications in their treatment regimen. Such antifungals may include the natural, coconut-derived fatty acid known as Caprylic acid (available over the counter), or stronger, prescriptive antifungals. These stronger medicines might consist of a combination of nystatin (a broad spectrum gut antifungal) and either itraconazole (Sporanox®) or fluconazole (Diflucan®). Chapter 13 of "Principles and Practice of Clinical Mycology" deals entirely with fungal infections in the gut. They describe how Blastomyces dermatitidis, a fungus, can produce "granulomatous" lesions in the intestines. Not surprisingly, this same type of lesion has also been seen in patients with Crohn's disease. Another fungus called Histoplasma produces intestinal disease with symptoms such as diarrhoea, weight loss, fever, and abdominal pain--sound familiar? The common lesions seen in the gut with this infection were "masses or ulcers mimicking inflammatory bowel disease or carcinoma." The authors concluded that histoplasmosis should be a "serious consideration" in an immunocompromised patient with signs and symptoms of IBD. Back to the big word "immunocompromised," which means the immune system has been compromised, or weakened. We strongly disagree that you must have cancer or AIDS or be on chemotherapy to have a weakened immune system. Just smell the air on your way to work or look at our standard American diet (SAD), or even look at the number of antibiotics we consume from childhood on. Could these be impeding our immune systems? Most antibiotics are mycotoxins--fungal derivatives. Mycotoxins are commonly found in our grain food supply. Mycotoxins can suppress our normal immune function. Therefore, anyone who has taken an antibiotic or consumes grains or sugar qualifies as a potentially immunocompromised person. We've seen thus far that, in just about every case of inflammatory bowel disease, conventional treatment involves the use of anti-inflammatories. Well, researchers at the Washington University in St. Louis took a bold step and did a study where they offered patients with Crohn's disease an immune stimulant instead. They used a medicine called Leukine--a naturally-occuring molecule called Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF). And though they faced harsh criticism from scientists at other universities for doing this, they obtained amazing results: of the initial 15 patients in the study, 12 did "significantly" better overall, while eight went into complete remission! Every one of the half a million patients with Crohn's disease in America should know about this study. But they shouldn't feel they need to rush in to their doctor's office to get this expensive shot (it costs around $300 per milliliter--that's $1,500 per teaspoon). Rather, they should learn from this study: by giving an immune booster, these doctors were able to put 53 percent of the cases into total remission. That almost implies that an infection is at the root of the disease, and that by assisting the body's immune system the medication helped the body overcome the "infection," or the disease. Typically, an anti-inflammatory medicine merely controls the symptoms of the disease--it doesn't cure it. That's because it rarely addresses the true cause of the disease. In other words, if the wrong diet is constantly consumed, or if damage (i.e. yeast overgrowth) is never reversed from previous antibiotic use, a cure can almost never be achieved. In this case, we feel that the "infection" in the intestines of Crohn's patients is caused by fungi and their mycotoxins. Incidentally, you can boost your immune system much less expensively and without a prescription by taking beta-glucans (see seagateproducts.com or nsc24.com). Using probiotics--Lactobacillus acidophilus, etc. (see natren.com)--is also extremely vital in reversing antibiotic damage, since these good bacteria can keep yeast and fungi from re-establishing themselves in the intestines. Anyone who has been diagnosed with ulcerative colitis
or Crohn's disease knows the misery these diseases can cause. Given the
alternatives for treatment--more immune-suppressing drugs and surgery--we
think it would be worth a trial on a program that includes a low-carb
diet and antifungal medications or supplements. A 1944 Johns Hopkins Clinical
Mycology book stressed the importance of following a low-carb diet while
treating yeasts.13 If a fungus or mycotoxin is truly involved, all of
these approaches will do more than just suppress the symptoms of or "manage"
the disease--they can actually cure it. PHILLIP DAY'S COMMENT: A great deal is now becoming known about fungi and their implications with ill-health. Drs. Kaufman and Holland are to be commended for their excellent books, as is Dr Joseph Mercola, who takes his characteristic, uncompromising stand on the same issues. In my new book, The ABC's of Disease, I deal with inflammatory bowel disorders and show how using an anti-Candida diet and natural anti-fungal supplementation is the way to go. Knowing also the many causes of bowel dysbiosis and how this delicate balance can be disrupted with the baleful 21st century diet is also important. Further resources References: Thalidomide Warning by Insurers The major agricultural insurance companies are refusing to insure farmers who intend to grow genetically modified crops, according to a survey that deals a further blow to Government hopes of approving at least one crop for commercial cultivation next year. The survey, conducted by working farmers of FARM, a campaign group, found insurance companies unwilling to take on the risk of liability claims against farmers who grew GM crops. Leading rural insurance underwriters told the farmers that they were concerned that "GM could be like thalidomide - only after some time would the full extent of the problems be seen". Some spoke of the potential of lawsuits akin to the big payouts for asbestos - exposure victims. "Fifty years ago, insurers were writing policies for asbestos without a care in the world. Now, they are facing claims of millions of pounds," one underwriter told the farmers. "The insurance industry has learned to be wary of new things, and there is a real feeling that GM could come back and bite you in five years' time." Rural insurers are so concerned at the scope for liability claims if the Government approves GM crops that they are even refusing to insure non-GM farmers due to contamination by GM pollen. The problem of how to grow GM crops and conventional varieties has proved to be such a difficult issue to resolve that the Prime Minister's advisers have repeatedly failed to reach a consensus. The Agriculture and Environment Biotechnology Commission, which advises the Government, is expected to deliver a much delayed report on co-existence by the end of the month. All the insurers surveyed felt that too little was known about the long-term effects on human health and the environment to be able to offer any form of cover for farmers growing GM crops. Even the NFU Mutual, the insurance arm of the National Farmers' Union, which is in favour of GM crops, will not provide insurance for farmers wanting to grow GM crops. A spokesman said the company believed the risks were not fully understood and advised farmers to seek cover through the biotechnology companies that own the patent to GM seeds. Agricultural Insurance Underwriters Agency, which underwrites policies for Norwich Union and Sun Alliance, said it had an exclusion clause for liability arising from GM crops. Rural Insurance Group, which underwrites Lloyds' policies, puts GM crops in the same bracket as terrorism and excludes them from cover. BIB Underwriters Limited, which underwrites AXA policies, said it would turn down any policy that has any association with GM, including cover for farm building and property insurance as well as public liability. A spokesman said that aside from the problems from cross contamination, BIB anticipated a risk of claims associated with arson or vandalism due to anti- GM protesters. Robin Maynard, the national co-ordinator of FARM, said:"When
insurers quantify GM crops in the same category as thalidomide, asbestos
and terrorism, no thinking farmer should risk their business and public
reputation by taking on this unproven, unwanted and unnecessary technology." Parents Seeking MMR Compensation Parents, seeking compensation for children they claim have been affected by the MMR vaccine, attacked a decision yesterday to withdraw legal aid for their High Court battle with three drugs companies. They condemned as "illogical and perverse" the decision by the Legal Services Commission to stop its funding only six months before the cases of more than 1,000 children were due to be heard. The children involved in the court cases, suffer from a range of disabilities including autism, bowel problems, epilepsy and other learning difficulties. The LSC said medical research had failed to provide a conclusive link between the jab and autism. It would, therefore, "not be correct" to spend a further £10 million of public money funding a trial that "is very unlikely to succeed". But JABS, a parent support organisation, said the withdrawal of legal aid, upheld on appeal yesterday, "served no public interest". Jackie Fletcher, the national co-ordinator, whose 11- year-old son developed epilepsy after having the jab, said the decision dealt a serious blow to parents seeking justice for their children. "These families believe their children are vaccine damaged and need to know why their lives changed so dramatically within such a short time of the MMR vaccine being given if it wasn't the vaccine," she said. "The court cases were vital not only to the families involved in the pursuit of justice for their children, but for all parents concerned about whether the vaccines they are giving their healthy children, are safe." She said that in America, the government and drugs companies recognised that "vaccine damage" did occur, and that the American National Vaccine Compensation programme provided a "no fault" compensation system. The LSC said it recognised that the children suffered from a series of serious medical conditions, and that the matter was of sufficient public interest to justify the £15 million invested in the case. But the failure of any medical body to provide a concrete link between the MMR jab and these health problems meant the case had little chance of success. "I appreciate that this decision will come as a great disappointment to the parents involved," said Clare Dodgson, the LSC chief executive. "I sympathise with their situation. Their children are clearly ill and they genuinely believe the MMR vaccine caused their illness. However, this litigation is very unlikely to prove their suspicions." Alexander Harris, the solicitors' firm representing the families, said it was "deeply disappointed" and "very surprised" at the decision. The Health Department said it hoped that the LSC's
decision would "draw a line" under the MMR issue. Periodontal Disease Profile Periodontal disease should be viewed as a systemic problem involving poor nutrition, immunity and hormonal imbalances in females. In America, 54% of adults over fifty suffer from periodontal disease. The disorder may also indicate a serious underlying condition, such as diabetes, anaemia, vitamin deficiency disorders and collagen irregularities. Patients suffering from the toxic immune disorder AIDS often suffer gum disease problems which progress rapidly. The condition manifests itself in several different forms: Gingivitis: One of
the most common manifestations of periodontal disease is the reddened,
swollen, and often bleeding gums of gingivitis, caused by the actions
of bacterial plaque on the surfaces of the teeth adjacent to the inflamed
tissues. Plaque, a soft, sticky film mostly comprising bacteria, if not
cleared away by brushing and flossing of the teeth, hardens into tartar
(calculus) within 72 hours, which has to be removed through dental cleaning.
Gingivitis can also be prevalent during hormonal fluctuations in women,
brought on by pregnancy, periods, puberty, menopause and the use of birth
control pills. In gingivitis, the gums become red and swollen, they often
bleed, and are moveable, rather than tight against the teeth. Commentary · Does the patient have poor immunity and catch
infections easily? Smoking Take action Further Resources Available through www.credence.org No Proof Mental Illness Rooted In Biology
Mental illness is said to be the cause of many of our society's social ills, such as suicide, murder, divorce, child abuse, sex offences, depression and various addictions. If only mental illness could be cured, mental health supporters say, all of these ills could be prevented. Because the mentally ill often are unaware of their disease, treatment must be forced on the mentally ill. All 50 states have laws that allow involuntary treatment if professionals deem they are a danger to self and others. Psychiatrists, we are told, can now accurately diagnose mental illness and have safe and effective treatments. Psychiatry is considered a valid medical specialty, like cardiology, and the claims of the movement are based on scientific research. The largest lay group is the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill (NAMI). The media routinely refer to NAMI as advocates for the mentally ill, although its membership consists almost entirely of family members and not the mentally ill themselves. NAMI ascribes to the "biological basis of mental illness," and endorses forced treatment of the mentally ill. The movement's major source of funding is the highly profitable pharmaceutical industry, which funds the drug research; which funds psychiatric journals, and even the American Psychiatric Association itself; which funds advertising to doctors and the public; and even funds lay groups such as NAMI (at least $11 million) and Children and Adults with Attention Deficit Disorder (at least $1 million). Yet many professionals claim that the mental health movement is not a legitimate medical or scientific endeavour, let alone a civil rights movement, but a political ideology of intolerance and inhumanity. Numerous psychiatrists and psychologists have examined the psychiatric research literature and found it to range from smoke and mirrors to quackery. Psychiatrists have yet to conclusively prove that a single mental illness has a biological or physical cause, or a genetic origin. Psychiatry has yet to develop a single physical test that can determine that an individual actually has a particular mental illness. Indeed, The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders uses behaviour, not physical symptoms, to diagnose mental illness, and it lacks both scientific reliability and validity. On Aug. 16, eight members of MindFreedom (www.mindfreedom.org), an umbrella organization of mental patients who call themselves "psychiatric survivors," began a Fast for Freedom "to press for human rights and choice in psychiatry" and to "demand that the mental health industry produce even one study proving the common industry claim that 'mental illness is biologically-based.' " Dr. James Scully of the American Psychiatric Association responded to the hunger strikers by claiming the evidence was so vast one need only look at "Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General" (1999) or a recent psychiatry textbook. An expert panel for the strikers, made up of members (like myself) of the International Centre for the Study of Psychiatry and Psychology (www.icspp.org), quickly responded by pointing out that neither of these works contains any such conclusive proof. Actually, the surgeon general's report on mental health states that "the precise causes (etiology) of mental disorders are not known" and "there is no definitive lesion, laboratory test, or abnormality in brain tissue that can identify (a mental) illness." The Textbook of Clinical Psychiatry (1999) states: " ... Validation of the diagnostic categories as specific entities has not been established." In its reply to the fasters, the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill did not cite any scientific evidence at all. In 1784, a similar debate raged in Paris about the scientific validity of the latest psychiatric nostrum (hypnotism) and its inventor, Dr. Franz Anton Mesmer, who claimed to have discovered a physical mechanism he called animal magnetism. The Academy of Sciences formed a panel, including American scientist Benjamin Franklin and French chemist Antoine Lavoisier, to assess the movement sweeping the city, and concluded that Mesmer's "cures" had no scientific basis. They were due entirely to the power of suggestion, now called the placebo effect. The Royal Society of Medicine issued a report with similar findings on Aug. 16, 1784. Let us hope the Fast for Freedom has a positive outcome for all involved. If not, let us insist that the American Medical Association
(or similar body) form a panel of objective, non-psychiatric scientists,
without any ties to drug companies, to examine whether psychiatry should
continue as a medical specialty or if it should join the historical ranks
of alchemy, astrology and phrenology as a pseudoscience. PHILLIP DAY'S COMMENT: The fraudulence of almost all psychiatry is examined in detail in my book, The Mind Game, for which The Campaign for Truth in Medicine received a human rights award earlier in the year. In this work, the reader will learn of the quackery and downright criminal activity, perpetrated by psychiatry, which continues to plague our society. From ADD to schizophrenia to dyslexia and 'learning disorders', Dr Hoeller is indeed correct. These are not 'mental diseases'. When these symptoms exist at all, science has found physical ailments which affect the workings of the mind at the root of them. As such, these can be successfully treated in most cases using nutritional and lifestyle strategies. In The Mind Game, there is a chapter on the school shooting phenomenon in America. Another examines Hollywood and how psychiatry has killed some of our best loved stars. Another conducts an in-depth analysis into the rock, pop and rap industry, and show the forces at work within it that have destroyed the lives of many working in the entertainment industry. Further resources SPECIAL OFFER FOR ALL
What Doctors Don't Tell You, the monthly newsletter which lifts the lid on modern medicine and lets you in on the secrets the medical establishment doesn't want you to know about, is offering their special report '100 ways to live to 100' FREE for download from their website. This report contains some of the best advice ever published for living your life free of medical intervention. Click here to download (www.wddty.co.uk/100ways.pdf) You can also sign-up for their FREE weekly e-news bulletin which keeps you bang up to date with all the latest health and medical news you won't read anywhere else. Click here to register (www.wddty.co.uk/e-news.asp)
The Secrets of the Drugs Industry, one of the most important books ever produced by What Doctors Don't Tell You, explains why this scandal is happening. Every time you take a prescription drug, you are an unwitting guinea pig in a vast experiment. That experiment will discover if the drug works and is safe. Although a drug passes through several trials before it is licensed, the truth is that very little is known about its effects until it is tested on hundreds of thousands of people to whom it is prescribed. The result is one of the greatest scandals in the West. Further Resources Available at
Wake Up To
Health in the 21st Century
Credence Publications release, October
2003
In this great new book from Credence Publications, author Steven Ransom brings a clear and simple message. Despite our increasingly toxic world, we can live healthily! And spending only a little time considering the information contained in this book is all that is needed to reap a long-lasting and very healthy return. Discover for yourself: · The full and fascinating history of vaccination:
read some amazing information on the true history of the so-called
'discoverer' of vaccination Edward Jenner. Learn about his poisonous vaccines
and today's gargantuan vaccine industry that has grown up on Jenner's
original false premise.
"Your writings are without doubt the most powerful, disturbing, heartbreaking, joyful, positive & brutally honest words I have ever read." Paul Smithson "A very excellent work of English wisdom." Peter Augustin "Congratulations on yet another brilliant unmasking
of bad science and public brainwashing!" José Manuel
Azevedo The Credence Bookstore
Books
Audio Tapes
Health Wars
Cancer: The Winnable War Cancer Politics/The Real War Video Tapes (PAL format only) Regional Offices Internet
ordering (secure servers) for all zones: Mailbag Some feedback from our subscribers
Will be delighted to get your bulletin. Keep up the good work. The information is wonderful. Thank you very much. Mrs Sheila B., Louth, Ireland A mind- opener. Anthony S., Nottinghamshire, UK. I am a teacher trying to assist my students to make
better and healthier choices. CTM is an excellent publication which provides excellent research/remedies on most health issues the general public need to discover. The sooner more people, especially those without 'www' access, become aware of the way the media and governments keep the general public in the dark, the better. Well done CTM and Credence. Chris O., Norwich, UK Top website and thanks for making it! Mr Keith H., Manchester, UK Keep up the good work! Warmest regards from Curry! John B., Co. Sligo, Ireland Thank you for the great effort you all are putting in to such an important and worthwhile cause. Keep up the great work. John B., W.A., Australia I have seen Phillip Day four or five times now. He is an excellent speaker and his talks are always very informative and enlightening. Keep up the good work! Helene R., Essex, UK Hats off to you. Thanks for keeping us informed of the "hidden" truth about health issues and other related matters. Your books are well worth reading, articulately written and facts and references are well researched. Juanita P., Victoria, Australia Great! I fully support the whole thing having been through a dysfunctional medical system which made me even sicker. Robert C., Christchurch, New Zealand I think that what is being offered by Phillip Day is really good. Mary S., Otorohanga, New Zealand Good stuff! Peter F., Gauteng, South Africa You have given me "food for thought"! An excellent talk. Cynthia M., Flintshire, UK Please send me regular updates and let me know how I can be more involved. I am a PhD student, studying Alternative Health in Britain from January 2004 onwards. Amrana A., Leicestershire, UK. Keep up the good work! Brad W., Essex, UK Dear Phillip When you were in Ballarat last November you asked me to write of my experience with breast cancer to encourage women with the same problem to try alternative treatment. Early in 2001, I felt a lump in my left breast. As it was very painful and movable I thought it was a cyst. I waited two months before seeing a surgeon. In that time it didn't alter. I had tests and a biopsy, which gave a diagnosis of cancer. My surgeon wanted to do a mastectomy with removal of the lymph nodes or a lumpectomy with removal of the lymph nodes, six weeks' radiotherapy and Tamoxifen to follow. I refused all this and just had a lumpectomy. Returning to my surgeon, I was told he had cut too close to the tumour and I would have to return to the hospital for the removal of more tissue. I was very sick after the second operation and then developed pleurisy and pneumonia. My surgeon had also wanted to experiment before the first operation by injecting dye into my breast and seeing which lymph nodes it affected. I also refused this. I was in almost constant pain for months at the site of the operation after reopening the incision. After recovering from the pleurisy and pneumonia,
I went to a clinic in Victoria for several weeks to have B17 and vitamin
C intravenously. Since then I have returned to normal living which I am
certain I would not have done after the treatment of radiotherapy and
Tamoxifen. Sorry I have not written sooner but I feel more confident now
that alternative treatment is working for me. I am careful of my diet
and eat apricot kernels every day.
Thanks very much for your great work. Anna G., Victoria, Australia
|
||||